Of the facts charged in the instant case, it is not guilty of violating the Road Traffic Act (the measures not taken after the accident). Of the facts charged in the instant case.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B-learning passenger cars (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

On January 7, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 12:46, and proceeded at a speed of about 70-80 kilometers per hour from the breadth to the inner side of the water at the breadth of the D in order to drive the said car at the speed of about 70-80 kilometers per hour.

At the same time, other vehicles are also running together, so the defendant who is engaged in the driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by not impeding the course of other vehicles in the vehicle that is going to change if he/she intends to change the lane.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went through a two-lane course from a one-lane to a two-lane, and caused the damaged vehicle to the right part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and caused the shock to the above damaged vehicle into a three-lane, and caused the above damaged vehicle to go into the right part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and caused the above damaged vehicle to go into a three-lane, into the right part of the victim’s G driving’s H-wing and the third cargo’s left part of the three-lane, and caused the victims to go into the right side part of the road, and caused the victims to go into approximately 2 weeks of street trees, etc., requiring approximately 9 weeks of treatment, and the victim E suffers from approximately 3-day treatment of the damaged vehicle at the same time as the injured vehicle, and the victim’s 3-day treatment of the damaged vehicle requires approximately 2-day treatment, and the victim’s 5-day treatment of the damaged vehicle, respectively.