1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 13, 2014, the network E (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) felled below the river at a height of 3 meters in front of the cafeteria Dongdong-gu G “H” restaurant during the bicycle patrol and sent back to the Japanese Emergency Hospital. However, on March 15, 2014, around 0:23, on which approximately 32 hours have passed after the fall, died on March 15, 2014.

B. A doctor I diagnosed the Deceased and prepare a medical certificate as follows:

The name of diagnosis on March 13, 2014: The name of diagnosis on March 13, 2014: The name of diagnosis: the name of diagnosis on February 13, 2014: the name of diagnosis on February 2, 2014: the name of diagnosis on cardiopulmonary hemosis (in the case of cardiopulmonary resuscitation), heart (in the case of cardiopulmonary resuscitation), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (in the case of cardiopulmonary resuscitation), and the name of examination on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (in the case of cardiopulmonary resuscitation) and the result of examination: brain CT- the direct cause of death of the deceased: The cause of direct death is presumed (or cannot be clearly known) to be presumed to be (in the case of direct death of the deceased due to the injury caused by an existing internal disease: Opinions

3. 13. It is difficult to clearly understand the reasons for the transition. ① A heart disease (the patient/protector was unaware of it), which could have been deprived of consciousness as a acute heart disorder, ② A stroke-cerebral brain in itself, etc., may have been exceeded due to stroke-cerebral stroke, and ③ A stroke-instroke, etc., which may have been exceeded due to a stroke-instroke, and ③ a stroke-instroke, not a stroke-instroke. A stroke-instroke in the state where a cardiopulmonary resuscitation was already performed before a hospital was located, and the stroke-instroke was impossible after the arrival of the emergency room. Although it is impossible to accurately know the reasons for the death, it can be inferred that the above possibility could be presumed.

C. The plaintiff is a person who has entered into an insurance contract as shown in the attached Form with the Korean Council in case of re-employment, and the plaintiff is a sudden and incidental person arising during the period of the injury insurance to the deceased (insured) during the insurance period.