A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant was unable to lend money to any woman, but the Defendant borrowed KRW 2 million as he/she tried to file a complaint against the said woman,” from a customary market and the victim C (the age of 59) located in the Kim Jong-sidong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong.”

However, at the time, the defendant did not have any property or income, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to pay it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 2 million won from the victim under the name of the borrowed money around that time, and acquired it by fraud.

2. The Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, at the same place as the beginning of the border, the Defendant lent KRW 500,000 to the above victim for the use of livestock pens expenses to those who live in the Cheongju because there is no money to borrow them. As such, the Defendant borrowed KRW 500,000 from the transportation expenses, etc., and, if so, would have to be repaid at the time when the drilling ends.

However, at the time, the defendant did not have any property or income, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to pay it.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as such and obtained 500,000 won from the victim under the name of the borrowed money around that time and acquired it by fraud.

3. On October 5, 2010, the Defendant: (a) at the point of the North Korean branch of Kim Jong-dong, Kim Jong-dong, Kim Jong-dong, Kim Jong-dong, the Defendant sold underground water to the said victim in order to cultivate livestock pens; (b) deposit KRW 7.5 million entrusted money to the Livestock Cooperative; (c) borrowed KRW 3.5 million as loans would be possible; and (d) made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant “Woo-ri” was inserted in the livestock shed upon the completion of the livestock shed.

However, even if 7.5 million won is borrowed from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to kill livestock or to engage in livestock industry together with the injured party.

Nevertheless, there is a need to do so.