logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.10.17 2013가합92
명의변경절차이행 등
Text

1. The part of the claim to nullify the invalidity of the primary claim of the plaintiff (appointed party) and the designated parties shall be dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

가. 원고들은 평창토건 주식회사(이하 ‘평창토건’이라 한다)로부터 건설임대주택을 임차한 사람들이고, 평창토건은 토목건축공사업을 목적으로 하는 회사이며, 피고는 울산 북구 B 및 C 일원의 토지에 관한 토지구획정리를 위하여 위 토지의 소유자들로 구성된 토지구획정리조합이다.

B. On January 28, 1999, the Defendant concluded a contract for the land readjustment project with the construction cost of KRW 100,803,926,00, and the construction period from January 29, 209 to August 12, 2003, with the construction period of KRW 100,803,926,00, and the construction period of KRW 1,441,300,00,000 on the land readjustment project with the members of the BC in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu. The Defendant changed the construction period to August 13, 2007.

(hereinafter “instant contract”). (c)

On November 1, 1999, the Defendant transferred the title of the trade ledger of land allotted by the authorities in recompense for development outlay regarding 316,530 square meters of land allotted by the authorities in recompense for development outlay in accordance with the land readjustment and rearrangement and rearrangement and alteration of the title in the name of the Korea Land Trust Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea Land Trust”).

The Housing Act (wholly amended by Act No. 8966, Mar. 21, 2008) was prescribed by the Rental Housing Act (wholly amended by Act No. 8966, Mar. 21, 2008), which is a rental business operator under the Rental Housing Act (wholly amended by Act No. 8966, Mar. 21, 2008) with some of the above land allotted by the National Housing Fund for the lease of the apartment in this case.

E. He was declared bankrupt on April 25, 2008 by the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2007Hahap68 on December 26, 2006 due to the business deterioration on December 26, 2006, and H was appointed as a trustee in bankruptcy for Pyeongtaek Changto (hereinafter “Seoul Changto”).

F. A lessee, including the Plaintiffs, demanded the sale of the leased part of the instant apartment and the relevant site for sale in lots, but the trustee in charge of Pyeongtaek-si's sale in lots.

arrow