beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are that there were errors in the result of each request for appraisal of medical records by the court of first instance, and that there is doubt that the defendant forged the medical records at the court of first instance, and it is not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance. In full view of the evidence submitted at the court of first instance and the evidence of evidence No. 13, 14, and 15 additionally submitted at the court of
Thus, the court's explanation of this case is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of the plaintiffs' arguments following the reduction of the plaintiffs' claims as follows. Thus, this court's explanation is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the
2. On the 3th page 19 to 4th page 2 of the first instance judgment in the corresponding part, "(169,910 won for treatment expenses, consolation money of KRW 30,00,00 for consolation money, and KRW 5,504,00 for mental damages (each 5,00,00 for consolation money) suffered by the deceased, and the plaintiff C, D, E, F, G, and H (each 5,00 won) for the damages incurred by the deceased, and (2) for the return of KRW 2,504,00 for the reason that the core part of the medical contract was not fulfilled and thus the amount equivalent to the medical expenses was unjustly gained," "The plaintiff B, C, F, I, J, and K shall claim for the return of KRW 18,00 for mental damages incurred by the deceased (the above materials shall be inherited in 3,00,000 for each one/6 of them), and the plaintiff C, D, E, G, G, and H shall be claimed (300) for mental damages."
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed as it is without merit (the judgment of the court of first instance as to the medical expenses withdrawn by the plaintiffs upon reduction of their claims, the portion equivalent to the medical expenses, the portion equivalent to unjust enrichment, and part of consolation money was invalidated)