logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2014.11.05 2014고단306
상해
Text

The defendant shall dismiss the application filed by the applicant for compensation.

Reasons

1. Around 03:00 on October 19, 2013, the Defendant, while walking ahead of the 'G' restaurant in the Gumisisi, Sinsi, the Defendant, at the expense of the victim C(31 years old), had a horn, and had a dispute.

When the Defendant came to know that the victim was drunkd by drinking alcohol, etc. to the victim, the Defendant extracted the height of the said vehicle, extracted the victim's face two times per week with the victim who was to return the kis of the vehicle, kis the victim's face two times per week by drinking, sit the victim's bridge three times by walking the victim's bridge on the floor, sit the victim's face on the floor, take the victim's face by drinking alcohol and launching the victim's face several times due to drinking, and the victim's escape can go beyond the victim's bridge and turn it back to the victim's face, including the victim's face, due to drinking and launching, and then the victim suffers injury, such as the victim's face, the right side in need of treatment for about eight weeks, and the downhead of the lower wall.

2. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, the victim C’s statements, diagnosis certificates, and investigation reports (the first medical center of the respondent C) are included in the victim C’s testimony and investigation agency, and considering the following circumstances, the victim’s statement is difficult to believe, and the remainder of evidence alone is insufficient to recognize the facts charged.

① From the police to the above time and place, the Defendant got off the Defendant’s female-friendly job H’s left side of the Defendant’s knee and proceeded without any speech at the above time and place. In the process of opening a car door and driving away from the victim, the Defendant made a consistent statement that the victim was faced with the floor beyond several times, and that there was no fact at the time.

② H also stated the Defendant as an alternative from the police to this court.

③ According to each diagnosis letter and the upper photograph of the victim, the upper part of the victim’s body is right eye, and the victim’s body is right eye.

arrow