1. The Defendant’s KRW 274,312,768 as well as 5% per annum from December 7, 2010 to October 29, 2014 as to the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. At around 07:10 on December 7, 2010, the Plaintiff, a worker of the Defendant, was cleaning the color tights to clean the tights at the workplace. The Plaintiff saw the tights to the right hand, which was faced with the tights.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

In the instant case, the Plaintiff received medical treatment by suffering injury from a wound on the right side, a part of the water department to the right side, a part of the water department to the right side, a part of the development of 2, 3, 4, and 5 water table, a part of the blood fever of 2, 3, 4, and 5 water surface, the right side of 2, 3, 3, 4, and 5 water surface.

C. The Plaintiff was paid KRW 19,538,510 of temporary layoff benefits under the Insurance Act in the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Report, KRW 15,337,910 of medical care benefits, and KRW 14,176,640 of disability benefits.

The Plaintiff was subject to drug treatment with multiple bruculatory fladism, and there was an obstacle to the side bruculatory brusium (former 0 degrees and 50 degrees of fladulites) of Section 1 of the right 2 balance, the steel of 3 balance of the right 4 balance, the steel of 4 balance of the right 5 balance, the steel of 5 balance of the right 5 balance (75% limit of the scope of movement), the side bruculum in the right brusium (former 45 degrees, 40 degrees, 40 degrees, 40 degrees, 40 degrees, 80 degrees, 80 degrees, 80 degrees, 80 degrees).

E. The Defendant did not educate the Plaintiff to stop the operation of the machinery in cleaning so that cleaning is carried out by the Plaintiff and the same workers as the Plaintiff through the promotion of the Defendant’s affiliation, etc., and the cleaning has been carried out.

[Reasons for Recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence Nos. 2 (including paper numbers), the witness Eul's testimony, the result of the appraisal of the dry University Hospital in this Court (excluding paper numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The occurrence of damage liability;

A. According to the above facts, the plaintiff should suspend the operation of the machinery and clean the machinery when cleaning the colorer with respect to the accident of this case from the defendant.