The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) is that the Defendant was at the right shoulder on August 11, 2016 by the Defendant around August 12, 2016.

However, in light of the written diagnosis, it appears that the phrase “ August 11, 2016” appears to be a clerical error.

Since the right shouldered up to the top, it was impossible to inflict an injury on the victim on August 14, 2016, which was 3 days later.

Therefore, the defendant did not inflict an injury on the victim with dangerous articles as stated in the judgment below.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the victim from the investigative agency to the court of the court below: (a) it is relatively consistent and detailed that “the defendant has reached two kniffs of the victim with the enormous fle, so that the victim has broken down one time, so that the victim can sniffs with the left hand, so that the victim can sniffs down one time,” ② the contents of the F, G’s statement and diagnosis correspond to the above statements by the victim; (c) the victim was unable to take the victim’s treatment on August 11, 2016, which was three days prior to the instant crime; (d) it is acknowledged that the victim and F did not have sold the victim’s knife at the time of the instant crime in light of the fact that the victim and F, despite having left the body of the victim’s knife that it was not possible for the victim to do so at the time of the crime.”