logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.15 2015고단2124
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 2124"

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles), Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after Accidents), and the Road Traffic Act as a driver of the CMFW car on April 7, 2015, the Defendant was driving a two-lane road in front of the Seocho-gu Seoul High School, Seocho-gu, Seoul, along the direction of the south cycle, along the two-lane road in front of the Seocho-gu Seoul High School.

Since there was an intersection where signal lights are installed on the front side, there was a duty of care to confirm whether a person engaged in driving service has a vehicle passing through the intersection by checking well the front left, and to drive safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, without obtaining a driver's license, the Defendant was negligent in driving the vehicle in violation of the vehicle stop signal while driving the vehicle in the direction of the steering station in the south side of the vehicle running along the direction of the drive of the victim D(39 years old) in the direction of the steering station according to the direction of the south side of the vehicle.

The Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim, such as the inside and outside of the area and the diagnosis, etc. requiring medical treatment for about two weeks. At the same time, the Defendant, while destroying damaged vehicles to come up with approximately KRW 13,924,938, did not immediately stop the damaged vehicles and failed to take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

2. On April 7, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the measurement) was demanded from F to respond to the measurement of alcohol for about 30 minutes, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant driven under the influence of alcohol, such as: (a) at the Seoul Western Police Station and the traffic accident investigation office from around 06:14 to around 06:45; (b) at the time of the accident as described in paragraph (1); and (c) at the time of the arrest of the Defendant, snacking the Defendant’s smell at the time of the arrest.

Nevertheless, the defendant is guilty.

arrow