1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Electric Power Resource Development Business (F Power Source Title Securing Business; hereinafter “instant business”): A business operator who intends to compensate for losses incurred on the ground or public space of the unclaimed land or in the steel tower site in which F Power Transmission Line passes, and to contribute to the stable supply of electricity by acquiring a license fee for the maintenance and repair of relevant electric facilities: G public notice of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy on September 12, 2013 - The Defendant:

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on January 22, 2015 - Use of H-15 square meters of land owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant land”). The Plaintiff’s shares in the instant land are 600/7,680, Plaintiff B, and D are 150/7,680, respectively, and the shares in Plaintiff E, and D are 300/7,680,680, respectively, and the power transmission line (hereinafter “electric transmission line”) passes through 1,894 square meters (hereinafter “electric transmission line”): 1,894 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”; hereinafter “the instant land is not owned”; 22,259 square meters of land owned by the Plaintiff; hereinafter “instant land”); - The appraisal corporation of the instant land is located within the scope of 300 meters from the outer line of the transmission line to the appraisal corporation of at least 1,894 square meters (hereinafter “the remaining part of the instant land”); - the appraisal corporation of at least 3045 meters and below 97.35 meters of land.

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered a judgment on compensation for losses on June 25, 2015 - The Plaintiffs filed a claim with the Central Land Tribunal for the adjudication on compensation for losses on the grounds that the price of the remaining land has decreased due to the passage through the electric transmission line of this case, but the Central Land Tribunal did not make the instant judgment on compensation for losses.