A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Power of crime] On February 24, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) in the support of the Suwon Frigwon method.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a vehicle B in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Risk Driving).

On May 19, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.216% from blood transfusions on May 19, 2020, and led to the two-lane road in front C in front of C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C interesting, along a one-lane from the view view room to the corresponding bank.

In such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately operating the brake system and controlling speed by checking the front side in a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded without examining the front door while under the influence of alcohol, and was negligent in driving as it is, before the Defendant’s proceeding, the lower part of the EM7 car driven by the victim D ( South and the age of 40) waiting for a signal signal in front of the Defendant’s direction was received as the front part of the car in the above SM7 car by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant, while driving a car in a state where it is difficult to drive the car normally due to influence of drinking, was faced with the injury of the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. of the trend requiring approximately two weeks medical treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) driving a B Sp-type car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.216% from a section of approximately 300 meters of alcohol content from the 300-meter radius from the sp-on (Haak-dong), Sin-si, Sin-si, Sinri-si, Sinri-si, to C in the front of Sinri-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement D traffic accident report on the police statement protocol, traffic accident.