The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. The fact that the defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected in the judgment is favorable.

On the other hand, even though the defendant was punished as a fine for violating the Act of the Reserve Forces in 2019, he still has failed to participate in the reserve forces training repeatedly, the defendant was punished several times, including imprisonment due to drinking driving and driving without a license, and even though he was punished as a repeated crime due to this, he was in the period of repeated crime, and the above unauthorized driving was committed while the defendant was prosecuted as a violation of the Act of the Reserve Forces and was tried.

In addition, considering the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.