logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.04.19 2017고정1987
보험사기방지특별법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant intentionally causes an intentional accident by means of a method against the body part of the vehicle in which the Defendant intentionally took place, and then has received insurance money from the insurance company.

Defendant on October 21, 2016 22:40 Osan-si around 22:40

d. Finding a white-sea car of the E Driving in the future where the Defendant was working on the street, the vehicle was faced with the driver intentionally by the driver, claiming the damages of the traffic accident and demanding the driver to deal with the insurance.

As a result, the Defendant was paid 450,000 won in Do under the name of hospital expenses and agreement by the damage insurance company in KB damage insurance due to intentional accidents.

2. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the materials presented in the judgment, it is insufficient to recognize that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone was sufficient to acknowledge that the Defendant intentionally faced with the laver at the time and place indicated in the facts charged, and that there was no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

① At this court, G presented a witness of the instant accident, “A person on the side of the Defendant was sealed by the Defendant at the inspection or the Defendant, thereby facing the Defendant’s arms at the top of the car operation.”

“The lower court made the statement.”

However, in light of the following circumstances, it is insufficient to view that the contents of witness conducted by G as evidence to prove the facts charged even if they were true.

At the time of the occurrence of the instant case, the Defendant was in a state of drinking to the extent that he was able to build the body in the West attitude.

Defendant

The left-hand side of the road, where the accident occurred, was parked on the left-hand side of the road, and in particular, it seems that Gohap was set up on the left-hand side of the location where the accident occurred with the direction of Defendant's driving and the vertical direction (see, e.g., video of the shooting situation).

arrow