Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 14, 2013, the Defendant received a summary order of a fine of three million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Seoul Central District Court.

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is the person engaged in driving cars B;

On June 12, 2020, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol 0.166% with a blood alcohol concentration around 23:10, and driven the 22-2-2 road at the Hansan-si Ansan-ro, an Eupnsan-ro, an Eupnsan-ro, along with a one-lane away from the south East-do bank to the air exhauster Administration and Welfare Center.

There is a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely manipulating the steering direction and brakes of the vehicle, who is engaged in driving of the vehicle with frequent traffic of the vehicle.

The defendant's negligence, while neglecting this, led to the failure of the defendant to stop in the same direction as that of the D urban bus driving C (36 years old) which was under the same direction, was completely shocked by the defendant's vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the injury of salt and tensions to the victim E (the age of 18), who is a bus passenger, for about two weeks of medical treatment due to the foregoing occupational negligence, the injury of the victim F (the age of 19), and the injury of salt and tensions that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim F (the age of 19), and the injury of the victim G (the age of 18), such as salt and tension in the part of the arms elbow, which requires two weeks of medical treatment.

2. A violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) was driven by the Defendant from a 5km section to a 22-2 km Masan City, Asan City, Masan-ro, from the front of a cafeteria around the Asan City bus terminal, while under the influence of alcohol with a 0.166% alcohol concentration during the temporary border under paragraph (1) of this Article.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. C’s statement;

1. A report on the state of drinking drivers, investigation report, and report on drinking alcohol;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. A previous conviction in judgment: