beta
Text
The judgment below
All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor against convictions shall be dismissed.
The judgment below
. Innocence.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. As to the crime No. 1 of the judgment of the court below, Defendant 1 did not induce the victim I as stated in the facts charged with respect to the lien or building permit, etc. of the instant building.
B) As to the crime No. 2(c) of the decision of the court below, the defendant had no intention to kill the victim Y. 2) The defendant was in a state of mental disability due to drinking, uneasiness, depression, depression, and depression at the time of committing the crime No. 2 of the judgment of the court below.
3) The lower court’s sentence of unfair sentencing (a punishment of 6 months, 12 years, and 12 years, seized evidence Nos. 1 and 2) on the crime of violation of Articles 2 through 4 of the lower judgment’s holding in the original judgment) is too unreasonable. (b) In relation to the fraud of mistake of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles as to the victim D, it is unfair to find the Defendant not guilty even if the crime of deception and deception was recognized by objective evidence at the time of the sales contract with the victim D as at the time of the sales contract with the victim D was based on mistake of facts
2 The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing is too uneasible and unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. Of the judgment of the court below, the defendant alleged the same purport as the grounds for appeal in this part of the judgment of the court below concerning the misunderstanding of facts as to the 1 crime No. 1 crime in the judgment of the court below, and the judgment of the court below as to
1. The Court rejected the above argument in detail under the title of "the argument for the crime No. 1 in its holding".
Examining the judgment of the court below in a thorough comparison with the records, it is sufficiently justified, and the judgment of the court below does not judge that there was an error of mistake of facts, as alleged by the defendant.
Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.
2. The Defendant alleged the same purport as the grounds for appeal in this part of the judgment below regarding the misunderstanding of facts as to the misunderstanding of facts as to the Da 2 of the judgment below.