logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.04.22 2019나51475
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The judgment of the first instance is justifiable even if the Plaintiff’s quoted in the judgment of the first instance was examined in light of the allegations and grounds that were supplemented by the trial.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal, addition, or deletion as follows.

Part 4 of the first instance judgment, from 15th to 5th 7th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth est k

Of the 11th written judgment of the first instance, “from July 2012 to July 7, 2015” is dismissed as “from May 2015,” and “from October 26, 2010 to around October 26, 2012” in the 11th written judgment of the first instance.

During the 12th session of the judgment of the court of first instance, the witness F of the court of first instance “it is difficult to look at the instant real estate” following the 10th session in the following: “(The Plaintiff’s husband and wife, and F, even after the Plaintiff’s husband and wife moved to the instant real estate in around 2012, they were well at H apartment, and there was a well time in the instant real estate. In addition, the Plaintiff’s husband and wife resided in H apartment from the date due to commuting problems to their place of work to December 2015, and F was residing in the instant real estate. The Plaintiff’s husband and wife and F moved to the instant real estate only with only the body used at the time when the Plaintiff’s husband and wife moved to the instant real estate at the time of the first director of the instant real estate.” The Plaintiff’s husband and wife testified to the effect that “Until December 2015, the Plaintiff’s husband and wife did not live the instant real estate again.”

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow