logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2019.02.15 2018고합136
강간미수
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by two years of imprisonment.

The defendant shall complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2018, the defendant parked in Chuncheon-si B around 20:30 on July 21, 2018, and during the course of dividing the victim D (n, 59 years of age) and talks with the same members of the mountain conference, the defendant left off the victim's personal post, bar, and panty.

Accordingly, the victim, while speaking as “Isle,” failed to resist by suppressing the victim of the thalth of the thalth of the thalth of the thalth of the thalth of the thalth of the thalth of the thalth of the thalth of the thalth of the thalth of the thalth of the thalth of the thalth of the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D;

1. Articles 300 and 297 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 25 (2) and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to be legally mitigated;

1. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes committed;

1. Articles 47(1) and 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from disclosure and notification orders, the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (the Defendant has no record of being punished for a sexual crime, and the Defendant is expected to have an effect on the prevention of recidivism even with the registration of personal information of the Defendant and the completion of a sexual assault treatment program to a certain extent. It is difficult to readily conclude that the instant crime alone committed against multiple unspecified persons. In full view of all the circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, occupation, home environment, social relationship, etc., as indicated in the argument of the instant case, the Defendant’s personal information should not be disclosed

1. Details and results of the instant crime under the proviso to Article 56(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, which is exempted from employment restriction orders;

arrow