All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds of appeal in this case, each sentence (Defendant A: Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months and confiscation; Defendant B; imprisonment for six months; imprisonment with prison labor for one year and confiscation; Defendant C; and Defendant D: suspended execution for six months and imprisonment with prison labor for two years and 120 hours) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. Although the operating period of each game of this case is relatively short, Defendant B and D are employees, there is a relatively large size of each game of this case, and Defendants were involved in the game room business in a systematic and planned manner, such as sharing their mutual roles. Defendant A again committed a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes with the same type of crime under the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Game Products and Game Products, even though it had been regulated by the police while operating the game room of the case of this case, and again committed a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes with the same type of crime under the condition that Defendant A again committed a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes with the same type of crime under the condition that Defendant A again committed a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes with the same type of crime under the condition that he had been sentenced for a suspended sentence of imprisonment for October 11, 2010 and again committed a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc.