beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On June 9, 2015, Plaintiff A, while drinking alcohol at “G cafeteria” located in the Daegu-gu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, he/she had the Defendant’s traffic, horse, dispute, etc. during that process, he/she was punished by the Defendant and the Defendant. After that, Plaintiff A received medical treatment in the hospital emergency room on the grounds of paralysis, etc. on both sides.
B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant were indicted on the following charges of injury as the Seoggu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court No. 2015Kadan1512 due to the foregoing case.
Defendant
On June 9, 2015, at around 20:30 on June 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol, such as the one-way “G restaurant” located in the Daegu Seo-gu, Seo-gu, the Defendant: (b) mispercing the Defendant that the Victim A had expressed his desire to “Chobing and racking wres” while engaging in a dispute with H; and (c) made the Victim her flab “Wing wres,” and her flabing the flab of the Victim, she slicked the Victim’s flab, and sated the Victim’s face to exceed the floor; and (d) caused the Victim to suffer defective water damage necessary for treatment for about 14 weeks.
Defendant
A (the Defendant, at the same time and place as above, sustained the victim E (the Defendant)’s breathing against the Defendant’s flapsing, and then faced the victim’s breath’s suspension of flapsing, and suffered the victim’s breath’s injury, which did not damage the hand saws that require approximately two weeks medical treatment.
C. The Plaintiff A led to confession of the facts charged in the court, but the Defendant denied the facts charged, and the court of the first instance rendered a judgment of conviction of KRW 1.5 million against the Plaintiff A on the grounds that both the facts charged by the Plaintiff A and the Defendant are recognized on February 5, 2016 and one year of suspended execution against the Defendant, respectively.
Since then, the plaintiff A did not appeal and the above judgment became final and conclusive, but the defendant appealed to the Daegu District Court 2016No739 on the ground of mistake of facts and unreasonable sentencing.
The appellate court.