All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because each of the punishments (Defendant A: fine of KRW 7 million, Defendant B: fine of KRW 5 million) declared by the lower court against the Defendants is too uneasible.

2. The judgment of this case is that Defendant A suffered injury to the victim D, such as fresh salt in need of approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim E, such as an internal infresh and inception, which require medical treatment for about ten days, and the nature of the crime is not somewhat weak in light of the content and result of the crime.

In addition, the defendants are criminal offenders of the same kind, and in the case of the defendant B, they are recidivism committed during the period of suspended execution.

However, on the other hand, the defendants have shown the attitude of recognizing and opposing their mistakes, and they have agreed with the victims.

In light of the above conditions unfavorable or favorable to the Defendants, and the age, sex, environment, and all other conditions of sentencing as shown in the instant pleadings, each sentence sentenced by the lower court against the Defendants is too uneasible and unreasonable.

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal against the defendants is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.