logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.11.26 2015고정432
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a 54-macifor.

On May 9, 2015, the Defendant driven a Track Track on the 19:30th of May, 2015, led to the intersection at the entrance distance of the water village in the Yanan-gun, the Yan-gun, the Yan-gun, the Yan-do.

Since there is a three-distance intersection where no signal apparatus is installed, there was a duty of care to check whether there is another motor vehicle to enter the intersection and safely drive the motor vehicle to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to turn back the above three-distance intersection from the ethal village to the ethic village from the ethal village of the victim D's drive, which was left to the ethic village, received the front part of the ethic wing of the freight vehicle as the rear part of the Defendant's driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, destroyed the cargo owned by the victim D to repair cost, and went away from the site without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the scene of traffic accidents;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the accused acknowledges and reflects his mistake; (b) the victim appears to have been partially negligent with respect to the instant traffic accident; and (c) the amount of the fine determined by the summary order

arrow