A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Punishment of the crime

On March 2, 2016, around 10:20, the Defendant: (a) discovered a female victim with whom it was impossible to know the name that the Defendant was able to know by putting the test fluor in the crosswalk near the apartment complex of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, J4; and (b) taken the victim’s bucks and spucks and sprinks of the victim’s 24 seconds, using the carmer function in the telephone carrying machine.

From around that time to 15:56 of the same day, the Defendant taken 18 female victims’ bucks and spucks and sprinks and sprinks, as indicated in the list of annexed crimes, with a total of 29 times.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of other persons who could cause sexual humiliation or shame by using a telephone carried device with a camera function against their will.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Photographs of seized articles;

1. Application of the DV Acts and subordinate statutes to screen and screen pictures by capturing a video file taken by the person under consideration;

1. Article 14 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and the Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. On May 17, 2012, the Defendant, for reasons of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, was notified of a summary order of a fine of three million won for the same type of crime. On August 28, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime and was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence for the same crime, and again committed the instant crime, even though the appellate trial was in progress, again, again, committed the instant crime. A large number of victims appear to have been female students with prison uniforms, and some victims took the knish part of the victims.

In light of these circumstances, the crime of this case is not easy to be a minor crime.