The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is divided in depth and reflects the defendant's mistake, and the defendant seems to have significantly poor health conditions due to the absence of extension, etc., and the contents of the crime of this case are part of the favorable circumstances for the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant merely administered philopon once, but the defendant committed the crime of this case in this case from around 1991 to 201, and the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime due to it. The defendant was investigated into the crime of this case, and even though he was aware that the result of the appraisal of philopon medication was about whether the philopon medication was performed, he immediately left the country and lives for a considerable period of time, and even though he was aware that there is a great need to strictly punish the crime of narcotics as a serious crime that has a high risk of harm and recidivism in society, and the motive, means and result of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, character, and environment, and the records of the defendant are not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.