logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.16 2014고단1830
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.A.) are those who drive B benz automobiles.

On December 23, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 23:20, and operated the five-lane road around 49-9 of the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul at a speed not to be known depending on three-lanes from the pressure-gu room to the Hanwon apartment bank.

At the time, there is an intersection where signal, etc. is installed at night and at the front, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle by reducing speed and taking a well-being signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant failed to see a stop signal while under the influence of alcohol and did not enter the intersection as it is, and instead, got the front part of the car driven by the Defendant after the victim C(the age of 48) driving a normal signal from the right side to the left side of the driving direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, inflicted bodily injury on the victim E (the 38-year-old passenger), who is the said cab passenger, sustained bodily injury such as spawal spawal spawal spawal spawal spawal spawal that requires treatment for about two weeks; suffered bodily injury on the victim F (the 42-year-old passenger), which requires treatment for about three weeks; at the same time, spawal spawal spawal spawal spawal spawal spas, which require treatment for about 1,150,216, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as stopping the said cab

2. The Defendant was driving a benz car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.094% from the 5km section to the place specified in paragraph (1) on the roads in front of a main station where it is impossible to identify the trade name in the Jung-gu, Seoul at the time specified in paragraph (1) of the Road Traffic Act.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow