The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a BK5-type taxi.

On March 8, 2017, the defendant driving the above taxi around 17:20 on March 8, 2017, and let the front of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C go to the left right turn along the two-lanes between the two-lanes from the shooting distance slope in the ero-dong.

It is an intersection where signal, etc. is installed, and a place where it is possible to make a left-hand turn for protection of green signals, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, when the defendant neglected to turn to the left at the red flash, the defendant shocked into the front part of the upper left part of the vehicle driven by the victim D(48 tax) which was driven by the victim D(48 tax).

In the end, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. We examine whether the instant traffic accident occurred by the Defendant’s violation of signals.

In the following circumstances recognized by the record and the results of examination of evidence, the intersection of this case is an intersection where it is possible to turn to the left, and the defendant driving a taxi as stated in the facts charged, and driving a taxi along the two-lane of the intersection of this case, and changing the lane to the first lane, and then making a left turn at the first lane. The defendant sent a red signal at the time of changing the lane to the first lane, but the signal at the time of the turn turn to the left was sent, but the signal was already changed to a green signal at the time of entering the crosswalk, i.e., at the time of moving the crosswalk, at the time of turn to the left turn, and the speed of the vehicle driven by the defendant at the time of turn to the left was not fast to 10 to 20 km per hour. The reason of the accident of this case was directly

E The driver of the low-speed car is also in breach of the duty of the front-time driver.