Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for up to eight months.

However, the above punishment against Defendant B for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 12, 2009, Defendant A sentenced ten months to imprisonment with prison labor for property damage, etc. at the Military Court of the Army of the 51th Army on February 12, 2009, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Army Prison on October 11, 2009.

Criminal facts

1. In relation to the Defendants’ disguised marriage arrangement, Defendant A heard that he would arrange for a disguised marriage from D, known to his knowledge, to introduce a person who will be engaged in a disguised marriage, and recommended a disguised marriage with Vietnam, a later-class employee of middle school, and upon acceptance of the above E, introduced E to D, a disguised marriage broker, and D introduced the above E to Defendant B and F, a disguised marriage broker, who is another disguised marriage broker.

In addition, Defendant B and F conspired to arrange for a disguised marriage between Vietnames and Korean men at Vietnam's local level, for E to report a marriage, for reporting a marriage, for E to help Vietnam women enter the Republic of Korea to register a foreigner, and for G, a general person responsible for a disguised marriage, for the overall disguised marriage process, and for the disguised marriage between Vietnams and Korean men in Vietnam.

On January 28, 2010, the Defendants conspired with H, G, F, D, E, and Vietnam women, and entered the non-furnal office located in the non-furnaled non-furnaled final final finite, in collusion with H, on January 10, 2010, the Defendants made a marriage declaration at husband E and H, as if they were to engage in a disguised marriage under the arrangement of the above Defendants without the intention of actual marriage, and as if they were to engage in a normal marriage, they would normally enter the marriage declaration and necessary documents into the above final final final final final final final final final h in the above final final h’s family register information processing system, which is the electronic records of E and had the above public officials

In addition, the Defendants conspired with E, etc. to make a false report of marriage to the public official in charge three times on the same day, such as in the attached list of crimes.