In a lawsuit of demurrer against distribution, the plaintiff asserts that the disposition of imposition is unlawful, but no evidence exists to acknowledge it.

In a lawsuit of demurrer against distribution, the plaintiff asserts that the disposition of imposition against the delinquent taxpayer is unlawful, but there is no evidence to prove this assertion, and the plaintiff's

2018 Ghana 1133 Demurrer

AA

Korea

May 10, 2018

June 7, 2018

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Cheong-gu Office

Of the dividend table prepared on February 7, 2018, the above court deleted 000 won of dividends against the defendant among the dividend table prepared on February 7, 2018 with respect to ○○ District Court ○○○○○○ Branch 2017, and corrected the dividend amount against the plaintiff to KRW 000,000, respectively.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The Plaintiff asserts as follows. In other words, the Plaintiff asserts on the date of distribution of the auction case of ○○○○○○○ Real Estate, which was conducted with respect to real estate owned by the obligor’s party at the same time, around 2017.

A person who received a dividend of KRW 000 as a mortgagee and the Defendant received a dividend of KRW 000 as a tax payer for a capital gain tax in the above auction case. However, despite the fact that the capital gain tax levied on him was paid in good faith, and the capital gains tax additionally granted was to be paid by the former owner BB, not a capital gain tax, the Defendant’s employees distributed dividends by seizing the real estate subject to the above auction case on the ground that the capital gains tax was not paid in the 00-year-old book. Therefore, in the above auction case, among the dividend table prepared on February 7, 2018, the date of distribution should be deleted since the dividends against the Defendant were erroneously distributed, and the amount of dividends against the Plaintiff, a mortgagee, should be corrected to KRW 00,000 in addition to the above dividends against the Defendant.

B. However, there is no evidence to prove the plaintiff's above assertion.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim cannot be accepted, and it is dismissed and it is so ordered as per Disposition.

partnership.