1. The claim of this case is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff asserts that on July 19, 2006, the payment date of KRW 30,000,000 to the defendant was set on July 19, 2006, and that the interest rate was set at 20% per annum, and that he paid the above amount.

In this regard, the defendant asserts that there is only the fact that the amount, the borrower, and the date of payment stated his/her personal information in the public letter of payment, and that there is no borrowing of the above money from the plaintiff.

The facts that a part of the contents of the document was filled after the fact that the blank part was filled by the authority duly delegated by the party who asserts the effect of the entry in the blank part is liable to prove the blank part (Supreme Court Decision 2011Da100923 Decided August 22, 2013), and the Plaintiff duly delegated the authority to fill the blank part.

or otherwise there is no evidence to prove that the Plaintiff lent the above-paid money to the Defendant.

Thus, the claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.