The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant and the victim C (year 57) of the instant facts charged operate a cafeteria and is a de facto marital person.

At around 22:10 on March 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed two knicks (30 cm each 30 cm) in the restaurant, which had been in the restaurant, on the ground that “the knicks and the knicks would drink a day with the knicks,” and threatened the victim by taking two knicks (30 cm each at the kitchen in the restaurant and the kitchen.”

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim can recognize the facts that he/she submitted to this court a letter of withdrawal of complaint containing the contents that he/she did not wish to punish the defendant on October 17, 2013, after the institution of the instant indictment. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure