The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) presented the defendant as a witness in the case of insult against the defendant, although the defendant did not have expressed his or her desire to G, H, and I, C, D, and E had been present as a witness in the case of insult against the defendant.

Therefore, the defendant's accusation of perjury does not constitute an accusation.

2. The court below consistently testified that the following facts acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① C, D, and E, were the persons living or staying in the same loan as the defendant around November 6, 2013 through around August 8, 2013; ② C, D, and E, instructed the defendant to take a bath about G, H, and I on November 6, 2013 through August 8, 2013; and the defendant's separate statement against the defendant from the crime of insult to the instant case; (3) the defendant's statement on the situation at the time or the defendant's abusive statement is recognized as credibility in line with each other; (4) the defendant argued that there was no insult of GH and I in the case of a separate offense of insult; (5) the court below rejected the defendant's testimony on the grounds that the defendant's testimony from the investigative agency to the court below corresponds with the facts charged; and (5) the witness's testimony and testimony of this case are not consistent with the defendant's witness's testimony of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.