1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B received KRW 3,000,000 from the Plaintiff and simultaneously entered in [Attachment B] No. 1.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff’s status 1) The Plaintiff is a housing reconstruction improvement zone A with a size of 45,839 square meters in Daegu Jung-gu, Daegu-gu E (hereinafter “instant improvement zone”).

(ii)The Daegu Metropolitan City Mayor on May 31, 2010 designated the instant rearrangement zone on the land for the purpose of removing the housing, commercial buildings, etc. built on the land and constructing a new apartment on the land.

On June 20, 2014, the Plaintiff approved the establishment of the head of the Gu among Daegu Metropolitan City, and was authorized to implement the project on May 8, 2017, and was publicly notified on May 10, 2017.

The head of the Daegu Metropolitan City approved the management and disposition plan of the plaintiff on February 14, 2018 and publicly notified on February 20 of the same month.

B. Defendant B, at the time of December 1, 2010, leased the 32.05 square meters of the first floor among the real estate listed in the [Attachment 1] No. 1 in the instant improvement zone from F, the owner of which, as of December 1, 2010, Defendant B operated the restaurant and continued to operate the restaurant after the termination of the contract period. Defendant C leased the lease contract after the termination of the contract period. (2) Defendant C leased the real estate listed in the [Attachment 2] No. 2 in the instant improvement zone from G, the owner of the land at the time of November 6, 2014, and operated the household production bank

3) At the time of February 1, 2013, Defendant D and his husband: (a) leased part of “B” in the attached list Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 3 among the real estate listed in the attached list No. 3 located in the instant rearrangement zone, which successively connected each point in the attached list No. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 3, and continued to operate the four-day shop by implied renewal of the lease contract after the termination of the contract period. [In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 6-2, 3, 8, 7, and 8-1, 2, and Eul’s evidence No. 1, 3, 8-2, and 1 through 3,

2. Determination

A. If a reconstruction project determines the cause of a claim and publicly notifies the approval of a management and disposal plan, the tenant of the previous land or structure within the rearrangement zone cannot use or benefit from the said real estate, and the project implementer is the project implementer.