A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 13, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 from the Daegu District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

피고인은 범죄전력 기재와 같이 도로교통법위반(음주운전)죄로 처벌받은 전력이 있음에도 불구하고, 2020. 8. 5. 12:20경 경북 청도군 B에 있는 ‘C’ 앞 도로에서, 교통사고 신고를 받고 출동한 청도경찰서 D파출소 소속 경위 E으로부터 피고인에게서 술 냄새가 나고 눈이 빨갛게 충혈되어 있고 음주감지기로 감지한 결과 빨간불이 감지되는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 같은 날 12:58경 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았으나 정당한 사유 없이 음주측정을 거부하고, 13:03경 재차 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았으나 정당한 사유 없이 거부하고, 13:11경 재차 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았으나 정당한 사유 없이 거부하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in court;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on the state of a driving driver, and a photograph of the accident site after notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal history records, inquiry reports, and investigation reports (verification of sound driving records);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1), 44 (1), and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act that choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on probation and order to attend a lecture, despite the existence of the record of drinking driving, is that the defendant drives a drinking again, and refuses to take a drinking level despite the existence of the record of drinking driving, and is against the disadvantage of the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant is against the quality of the crime, and other favorable circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, means