logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2013.05.23 2013고단170
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On February 26, 1996, the Defendant is the owner of a truck A, who is his employee B, violated the restriction on operation by loading the cargo of 11.2 tons at the 4 livestock shed in excess of 10 tons of a stable weight at the 10 tons of a 16-on-on-on-on-on-city inspection station in order to operate the said vehicle.

2. The judgment prosecutor, applying Article 86 and Article 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), shall institute a public action, and the sentence of a fine of 500,000 won is finalized by a summary order No. 96 high-ranking974 of Jun. 20, 196, but the sentence of a fine of 500,000 won has become final and conclusive, but Article 86 of the above Act provides that "if an agent, employee or other employee of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under Article 83(1) shall also be imposed on the corporation, which shall be imposed on October 28, 2010."

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow