logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.17 2016가단5205383
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s determination on the cause of the claim is the cause of the instant claim. “The Plaintiff believed the Defendant’s horse that he would pay a large amount of interest upon deposit of money, and demanded payment of the said money from October 3, 2015 to March 8, 2016, the Defendant paid the interest, and then the contact was cut down after the Defendant paid the last payment of the interest on March 10, 2016. After which, through C, the Defendant introduced the Defendant, 71,650,000 won calculated by C (10,000 won and KRW 16,40,000,000 and KRW 16,40,000,000 and KRW 16,40,000,000,000 were to be paid to the Plaintiff.” As such, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the above money and delay damages were sought, and there was no evidence to acknowledge any difference between the Plaintiff’s reimbursement agreement and each of the above facts.

2. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow