beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.
Reasons
The Plaintiff is a school juristic person that established and operates the E University, and the intervenors B are teachers and staff of the E University from February 17, 2012 to the head of the school affairs team from February 19, 1982, the Intervenor C is a person who was employed as the staff member of the Information Support Center, and the Intervenor D is a person who was employed as the staff member of the Information Support Center from February 17, 2012 to January 17, 2012, and from February 25, 2011 to July 25, 2014.
On March 18, 2015, the Plaintiff dismissed the intervenors following the resolution of the Employee Disciplinary Committee.
【Cause of Disciplinary Action】
1. Intervenor B and C are the head of the school affairs team, and the Intervenor C, as the head of the school affairs team, has the duty to faithfully perform the duties of appointing and managing faculty members in E as well as the school affairs team leader of the school affairs division. Furthermore, in appointing E-Board faculty members, the legal duty of performing the duties of preparing documents related to the appointment of faculty members and keeping them and reporting them to the Ministry of Education, as prescribed by the Private School Act and the articles of incorporation of the Plaintiff.
Nevertheless, in performing the duties of appointing full-time faculty members of the E University in January 17, 2013, the intervenors did not submit the support document and research records for the appointment of Eair tour and Chinese language conference teachers during the period from January 17, 2013 to January 27, 2013, which is the period of receipt of the support documents under the “public announcement of invitation of full-time faculty members” as of January 17, 2013, and there was no fact that the president of the E University requested the Plaintiff to appoint F as teaching staff, and the Plaintiff’s president and the president did not exercise the right of appointment of F as teaching staff of the E University. As of February 26, 2013, the Intervenor is a “EF Team-3572 (ice 18, 2013) non-permanent teachers and non-permanent teaching staff members holding office concurrently, who are employed by the president of the E University.”