1. The Defendants jointly indicate the attached Form 2 drawings 1 among the two-storys underground of the building listed in the attached Table 1 list to the Plaintiff.

1. According to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the plaintiff on April 10, 2013, the following facts are as follows: "The second underground floor of the building indicated in the table No. 1, 2062.17 square meters owned by the plaintiff to the defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "the defendant Co., Ltd.") on April 10, 2013: "The part (A) of the building connected each point of 1, 2, 3, 44 and 1, 249.08 square meters connected each point of 1, 249.08 square meters" and "the third underground floor of the building No. 319.58 square meters listed in the table No. 1, 2974, 700, 11, 829, 300, 200, and 200, from May 1, 2013 to Apr. 30, 2018).

2. According to the above facts, the lease relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Company under the above lease agreement has already been terminated due to the termination or expiration of the lease term on the grounds of overdue delay. Accordingly, the Defendant Company, the lessee, and the sub-lease of this agreement, are jointly obligated to deliver the subject matter of the lease to the Plaintiff (the Defendant’s duty of delivery is legally indivisible). The circumstances cited by the Defendants (a large amount of money invested and the discontinuance of business may cause a big loss) alone, and the Defendants are legally authorized to occupy and use the subject matter of the lease.

(b).