Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Around 18:40 on October 2, 2014, the Defendant driven a rocketing car as B on the duty of 18:40, and driven a three-lane road in front of the Cheongju-gu, Seowon-gu, Seowon-gu, the Defendant reported the opening of the three-lane road at the speed from the right side to the right side of the minutes. In such cases, it was difficult for a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle to drive the motor vehicle at night at night, and therefore, in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to check whether there is a person who walks the way to reduce speed and drive the motor vehicle, and to check the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle, while neglecting the duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle, the victim E (the 67 years old) crossing the road from the right side of the Defendant’s running direction to the right side of the road.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence caused the death of the victim due to the suspension of cardiopulmonary function due to the increase of two internal pressure from the hospital of Chungcheongnam-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongju-si, 1 cycle at 776, around October 4, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the actual condition survey report, death diagnosis report, autopsy appraisal report, and Acts and subordinate statutes governing the scene of an accident;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The defendant's vehicle selection of a selective fine is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance policy, the victim's bereaved family members and the victim's negligence, which has been crossed than the central line, appears to have been one of the causes of the instant accident, the opposite light appears to have an impact on the identification of the opposite light, the victim died due to the defendant's negligence, and the victim died due to the second damage caused by the defendant's negligence.