1. The inheritance contract concluded on October 26, 201 between Nonparty E and the Defendants is indicated in the annexed real estate.

1. The following facts are based on the following facts: (a) the Plaintiff and the Defendants do not dispute each other; (b) Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, 7, 16; (c) Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 3; (d) Eul evidence Nos. 7-1 through 8; and (e) the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the submission order by this court.

On July 7, 2010, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Nonparty E for the claim for the lease deposit with this court, and the said court rendered a judgment ordering that “E shall pay to the Plaintiff the amount calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from January 23, 2010 to the date of full payment, with respect to the said amount of KRW 79.7 million,” and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 28, 2010.

B. On September 29, 201, Nonparty F, who owned each of the instant building and the instant deposits, died on September 29, 201. The deceased’s co-inheritors were seven lineal descendants, G, E, and H. However, on October 26, 201, the co-inheritors agreed to inherit one-fourth share of each of the instant building and each of the instant deposits (hereinafter “instant agreement on the division of inherited property”). On September 29, 201, the Defendants agreed to inherit one-fourth share of each of the instant shares (hereinafter “instant agreement on the division of inherited property”). On October 28, 201, Nonparty F received the ownership transfer registration for each of the Defendants’ respective shares under the name of the Busan District Court Branch Branch was completed on October 28, 2011 on October 28, 2011. Nonparty I received the ownership transfer registration for the entire co-inheritors as the owner on November 24, 2011.

C. At the time of the instant agreement on the division of inherited property, E did not have any particular property other than active property inherited from the networkF. In selling the instant building to I, the transaction value is KRW 340 million, and each of the deposits of this case was withdrawn on or around January 19, 2012.

2. According to the reasoning of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, E is already in excess of the debt.