The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal (a sentence of three years of suspended execution in one year and six months of imprisonment, and a community service order of two hundred hours in two hundred hours of imprisonment) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below does not mean that the defendant's liability for the crime of this case is less than that of this case in light of the following facts: (a) although the crime of this case was committed by the defendant, considering the fact that the defendant was committed by the main illness, which is a dangerous object, the victim's head was deprived of the victim's face in several times; (b) the victim's face was inflicted by hand; (c) the crime of this case was committed by hand, in light of the method of the crime and the degree of injury; (d) the degree of injury was not minor; and (e) the victim was punished by violence in the past; (e) the defendant led to the crime of this case, the defendant's confession and is against depth; (e) the victim's age at the time of the crime of this case was presumed to have been caused by contingency by agreement with the victim; (e) there was no history of punishment more severe than the previous fine; and (e) the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment; and (e) the motive, motive and circumstances of the crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.