The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined (to the extent of supplement in case of supplemental appellate briefs not timely filed).

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of all the charges of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and it did not err by violating logical and empirical rules and by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence without properly conducting necessary deliberation as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Of the grounds of appeal, the misapprehension of legal principles or incomplete hearing concerning the admissibility of evidence of the suspect examination protocol prepared by the public prosecutor is asserted only in the grounds of appeal that the defendant did not consider it as the grounds of appeal or that the court below did not consider it as an ex officio

Furthermore, the lower court did not err in its determination as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.