Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for 6 months, respectively.

except that from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

[2017 Highest 1077- Defendants] No person, other than a person establishing a weak country, may sell drugs or acquire drugs for sale.

In this context, name-free H, as a general book for sale, runs an advertisement for selling adult drugs, such as a balutic treatment system, through an Internet site (I), and send them to J, a domestic general book, by securing fake crye and balgra, forged in China, etc. In order to sell the said medicines to the Defendants in the Republic of Korea, J conspiredd with the Defendants to pack and deliver them to the Defendants in order to sell eggs, etc., a specialized medicine.

Defendant

B and C, together with the above H and J from October 27, 2016 to March 20, 2017, as described in the list of offenses Nos. 1 to 666, as shown in the attached Table Nos. 26 and 222 of the Dong-gu Incheon, Dong-gu, Incheon, and distributed and sold them. Defendant A participated in the above J et al.’s crime around December 26, 2016 and sold drugs equivalent to KRW 10,805,40 over 234 times a year, as stated in the list of offenses Nos. 433 through 6666, from January 3, 2017 to March 20, 2017.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the above H and J, and sold medicines in collusion with a pharmacy founder.

[Defendant A] On January 28, 2013, at the point of calculation of Hyundai Motor Vehicle, Inc. in Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, the Defendant agreed to pay KRW 16,90,000 per annum 5.9% per annum and KRW 396,123 per annum for 48 months from January 28, 2013 to January 20, 2017, by means of equal installment repayment of principal and interest, at the time of purchase of LA-to-tur automobile at the point of calculation of Hyundai Motor Vehicle Accounting Co., Ltd. located in the operation Dong of Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, Incheon, the Defendant set up a right to collateral security in the victim’s name on January 29, 2013.

However, on October 2013, the Defendant borrowed KRW 5,000,000 to a credit service provider under his name and delivered the said car as security and made it impossible to identify the location of the car.

Accordingly, the defendant is the object of the victim's right to collateral security.