1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court is that the court decided to purchase “the purchase” under Section 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The sales contract of the instant woodland No. 1 and the instant woodland No. 2 is deemed to be the instant sales contract.

In addition to "the judgment of the court of first instance", it is identical to the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The grounds for this part of the parties’ assertion were stated by the court. The name was changed to “Licensed Real Estate Agent Act” by Act No. 12374, Jan. 28, 2014, as the former Licensed Real Estate Agent Business Affairs Act No. 17, No. 4 of the judgment of the first instance. 17.

hereinafter referred to as the "former Licensed Real Estate Agent Act"

"B" The business affairs of licensed real estate agents and reports of real estate transactions Act (amended by Act No. 12374, Jan. 28, 2014; hereinafter referred to as the "former Licensed Real Estate Agent Act").

It is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for a change to another one, and thus, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Determination

A. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court below is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (Article 3-3(a) and (b). Thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. The fact that the Defendant arranged the instant sales contract for the cause of the claim No. 1 and the fact that the instant sales contract was eventually impossible to perform is as seen earlier.

However, it is difficult to view that the Defendant, as an intermediary, bears the obligation to guarantee the execution of the instant sales contract, beyond mediating the instant sales contract as an intermediary. Thus, even if the instant sales contract is impossible to perform, the Defendant cannot be deemed to have fulfilled its obligation under the brokerage contract on the ground of such circumstances.

In addition, this case.