logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2018.10.24 2017가단106544
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: (a) the real estate listed in [Attachment] Section 1;

B. Defendant C is listed in [Attachment List 5].

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a cooperative established pursuant to the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) to implement a housing redevelopment project on the F103,621.76 square meters (hereinafter “A”) in the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Msan-si, and each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) belongs to the rearrangement zone.

B. On December 15, 2015, the Changwon market approved and publicly notified a management and disposal plan for A Housing Redevelopment Improvement Project.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant notice”) C.

Defendant B and D are the owners of the real estate listed in attached Tables 1 and 7, who became eligible for cash settlement because they failed to apply for parcelling-out to the Plaintiff within the period of application for parcelling-out. Defendant C and E are the lessees of the real estate listed in attached Tables 5 and 12, and the Defendants currently occupy each of the real estate of this case.

In accordance with the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works (hereinafter referred to as the "Public Works Act"), the Gyeongnam-do Regional Land Expropriation Committee made a ruling on December 26, 2017 to expropriate the real estate listed in paragraphs 1 and 7 of the attached Table No. 1 and 4 of the attached Table No. 1 of Defendant B and D (the starting date of expropriation).

Accordingly, on February 8, 2018 and 13th of the same month, the Plaintiff deposited the said Defendants as a depositee, and deposited the amount of compensation determined by the said ruling.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1, 2, 4, 9, Gap's 10-1, 2, and 10-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. After the instant public notice of Article 81(1) main text of the Act on the Determination of Grounds for Claim, the Urban Improvement Act was wholly amended by Act No. 14567, Feb. 8, 2017; however, the instant public notice was deemed to have been made under the amended Act pursuant to Article 25 of the Addenda (amended by February 8, 2017). As such, Article 81 of the former Urban Improvement Act, which is not Article 49 of the former Urban Improvement Act (amended by Act No. 14567, Feb. 8, 2017), which is a current Act, rather than Article 89 of the former Urban Improvement Act.

(b).

arrow