logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.02.16 2015고단2557
일반교통방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven the EBD car owned by the Defendant and parked the said vehicle at the above BD parking lot in the Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant, at around 02:33, the Defendant was residing in D, with the Defendant’s relative residing in D, and subsequently parked the said vehicle.

Although the defendant parked the above vehicle, he did not malk the vehicle, followed the balk in the vehicle without using it as a balking (P) and carried about about 30 minutes in the vehicle with approximately 30 minutes of balk, set the balk, thereby blocking the above vehicle from the road around 03:24 on the same day as the vehicle was pushed down in the parking lot.

Therefore, even though the Defendant was aware that the above vehicle was protruding on the road due to locking, left alone without reporting it to the police or the insurance company on the parking lot, the Defendant interfered with traffic by leaving a large number of vehicles, such as the environmental U.S. dollars, which were trying to proceed with the above road during the said period of time, after receiving a report from the police around 05:23 on the same day, and going back again within the said vehicle, until they were dispatched.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the second public trial date);

1. A investigation report (a CCTV search for security guards);

1. Notification to the department related to the report of 112 case;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a photograph and to a visual image closure;

1. Article 185 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 185 of the Criminal Act selective punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on June 13, 2014 is that the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months on the grounds of a violation of road traffic law on June 13, 2014, and is not aware of the fact that he/she was under the suspended sentence of 2 years, and the Defendant is likely to be subject to criticism on drinking C in the automobile.

However, it seems that the defendant seems that he did not proceed to the driving of alcohol in a drunken state, and in order not to drink again, he is receiving the treatment of alcohol alcohol.

arrow