1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: (a) the real estate listed in [Attachment] Section 1;

B. Defendant C shall set out in attached list 2.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment and consolidation project association that has been established with the total area of 174,801 square meters in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government as a project implementation district.

B. The Plaintiff received the authorization for project implementation on December 21, 2009 from the head of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the authorization for the management and disposal plan under Article 49(2) and (3) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”), respectively, on December 10, 2015, and around that time, the management and disposal plan was

C. The Defendants are the lessees of each real estate indicated in the separate sheet located within the project implementation district (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”), and the owners and lessors of each of the instant real estate and F are the persons subject to cash settlement who did not apply for parcelling-out. D.

With respect to each real estate in this case, the Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication of expropriation with the local Land Expropriation Committee of Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which is the owner of E and F, who did not reach an agreement. On September 30, 2016, the Committee deposited the total amount of compensation for losses under the above adjudication of expropriation as of November 18, 2016, and October 28, 2016, the date of commencement of expropriation as of December 16, 2016, and the compensation for losses for E and F as of December 16, 2016, respectively. The Plaintiff deposited the total amount of compensation for losses under the above adjudication of expropriation on November 8, 2016.

[Reasons for Recognition] Defendant B: A without any dispute, entry in Gap's 1 through 6 (including a paper number), and the purport of the whole oral argument

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the plaintiff, after the public notice of approval of the management and disposal plan was given, completed the compensation for losses by depositing the full amount of compensation for losses in accordance with the adjudication of acceptance of this case with the lessor of the defendants as the principal deposit. Thus, the defendants possessing each of the real estate of this case have the duty to deliver

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants of this case is justified, and the costs of lawsuit are individually accepted in consideration of the process of filing the lawsuit of this case and the progress of the case.