A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

『2014고단1154』 피고인은 2014. 7. 5. 17:30경 부산 수영구 광안해변로 361에 있는 수변공원 야외공연장 앞에서, 술에 취하여 아무런 이유 없이 공연을 하고 있던 색소폰 동호회 회원들에게 욕설을 하며 행패를 부리던 중, 신고를 받고 출동한 부산남부경찰서 C지구대 소속 경위 D이 피고인에게 공연을 방해하지 말고 귀가하라고 말하자, 위 D에게 “야 개새끼야 씹할 놈아, 내가 뭘 잘못 했냐”라고 욕설을 하며 위 D의 얼굴을 향해 주먹을 수회 휘둘러 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order.

around 11:05 on May 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated that “I must, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me, me.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the control of the victim in the office building, crime prevention, and maintenance of order of the victim who is a public official of the Busan Dong-gu Office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and G

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Among concurrent offenders, it is recognized that the defendant's mistake is divided for the reason of sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.

However, the defendant committed the crime of this case again even if he had been tried for the same kind of crime, and otherwise committed the crime of this case, such as the age, character, conduct and environment of the defendant, motive, means and result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.