logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2011.02.11 2010고단2287
사기 등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a psychiatrist who operates the “F Hospital” in the five floors of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-building.

1. Fraud;

A. On May 24, 2008, the Defendant filed a claim with the National Health Insurance Management Corporation for the amount of medical care benefits of KRW 19,370,00, which had been completed at the National Health Insurance Corporation as the victim, for a personal mental health care benefit, even though he/she did not perform the Privacy for the patient G of the Defendant’s hospital, and for the same year from April 1, 2008.

6. Until December 22, 200, the victim received a total of KRW 7,476,820 from the victim by the above means, such as the attached list 1, 142.

B. On October 18, 2008, the Defendant: (a) filed a claim with the National Health Insurance Corporation for KRW 11,250 of the two medical care benefits, which provided medical treatment to H, although the facts at the above F Hospital did not have provided medical treatment to H; (b) and (c) received a total of KRW 82,630 from the victim through seven occasions until February 24, 2009, as shown in attached Table 2 of the List of Offenses Act, from the time to February 24, 2009.

C. Around March 31, 2009, the Defendant issued a prescription after the patient I heard the statement of the said J with an excursion ship without the Defendant’s hospital, and claiming KRW 17,120,00, such as diagnosis fees and medicine expenses, from that time, as if the patient I had conducted a medical examination at the National Health Insurance Management Corporation, which is the victim, at the request of the J.

7. From 31.38 times to 78 times, the sum of KRW 4,550,00 was remitted as if the patient did not have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have to have had to have had to

2. The Defendant is a psychiatrist operating a psychiatrist in charge of the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. and the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act as above, and the medical practitioner dealing with narcotics shall not administer the psychotropic drugs or issue a prescription for the psychotropic drugs for any purpose other than his duties, and the doctor shall do so.

arrow