logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.05.08 2013고단275
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

around 19:03 on January 6, 2013, the Defendant driven the CMM car, and proceeded in the direction of transmission from the bridge of the Sin-dong at a speed of approximately 40-50 kilometers per hour, depending on the three-lanes in front of the Samsung Digital Eflaser, which is in the Gunsan Sinsan-dong, in the direction of transmission along the speed of about 40-50 kilometers per hour.

At the same time, since it is difficult to secure the view due to the fact that it was difficult to set up around the night, the driver had a duty of care to ensure the safe driving by accurately operating the front door and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting the above duty of care, conflicted the victim D (the age of 73) crossing the road to the right side from the left side of the moving direction due to the negligence, which was conducted by the Defendant without neglecting the above duty of care.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, which caused damage to the personality of the second 12 weeks of treatment, to the sacrife, to the sacrife, to the sacrife, to the other hand, and to the other hand of the second sacrife, to the right sacrife, and to the right sacrife of the second sacrife.

Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is not punishable

arrow