logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2012.12.13 2012고단5185
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who is engaged in driving a C low-priced car.

On April 24, 2012, at around 17:30 on April 24, 2012, the Defendant moved to the right angle from the right angle of new abuse to the right angle of five lanes from the right angle of new abuse.

At this time, a driver of a motor vehicle is obliged to walk the five-lanes at the right side of the road prior to moving to the right side of the motor vehicle, and the driver of a motor vehicle is obliged to take the right side well, and there is a duty of care to move to the right side safely after checking whether there is a person who walks the road in accordance with the signals, such as walking on the crosswalk, etc., installed on the right side of the direction.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the injury to the victim by driving a bicycle on the right side of the crosswalk in violation of the suspension signal for the right side of the front side of the road, and driving a bicycle on the right side of the crosswalk in violation of the suspension signal for the front side of the road on which the pedestrian signal is on-and-way, and driving the bicycle on the right side of the crosswalk, not finding the victim D (In 55 years old), and getting the bicycle loaded on the right side of the vehicle of the Defendant driving. In addition, the Defendant got the victim to get the bicycle loaded on the right side of the victim on the front side of the vehicle of the vehicle of the Defendant driving for about 12 weeks.

2. Determination

A. 1) With respect to the purport of prosecution by the prosecution, if the defendant had a green flickering signal, etc. in the crosswalk where the victim was frighted at the time of the right-hand transmission, as stated in the facts charged, the prosecutor's office used a signal signal, etc. on the vehicle that the defendant tried to enter the lane where the defendant was about to enter the right-hand line under the signal system, the signal light, etc. (the signal, etc. on the vehicle that the defendant tried to drive in the right-hand direction at the gold control zone on the 8 side of the investigation record, was displayed, and the defendant also sought a signal, etc.

arrow