Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 13, 2015, the Defendant was unable to undergo the said training without justifiable grounds despite receiving a notice of convening a training call in the name of the 2th unit commander of the Army, which was conducted at the training site of the 108th unit of the 2nd unit of the 9585 unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 19585 unit of the 2nd unit of the 2015 unit of the 2015 unit of the 2015 unit of the B apartment at the Jeonju-si.

On April 10, 2015, the Defendant received a muster notice to undergo the training of local reserve forces at the training site of the Jeonju-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on April 21, 2015 from the Defendant’s house located in 10:46, J. 10:46, 2015, and directly delivered it to C.

However, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.

The defendant of "2015 Highly 772" is the defendant's house located in Dagsan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City B apartment on April 27, 2015 and the same year at the office of the defendant, who is located in Dagdong 108.

5. On the 15th anniversary of the receipt of a notice of convening a drill in the name of the second unit commander of the Army, 9585, which directly caused the second unit training conducted at the training site of the reserve forces in the Jeonju-si, the training was not conducted without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by each of the defendants in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. A written delivery of each notice of convening education and training;

1. Each accusation;

1. Receipt of each notice of convening education and training;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and accompanying documents;

1. Article 15 (9) 1 and Article 6 (1) of the Act on the Establishment of Local Reserve Forces and the Selection of Fines concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 15 (9) 1 and 6 (1) of the same Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The gist of the assertion is that the Defendant, as a new witness of women and children, refused to participate in reserve forces training according to conscience formed by that religious doctrine.